首页> 外文OA文献 >A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA® laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery
【2h】

A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA® laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery

机译:妇科腹腔镜手术后使用ProSealLMA®喉罩气道与气管导管比较气道管理对术后镇痛要求的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In a randomised double blind prospective study, we tested the hypothesis that postoperative pain is lower in patients who receive an ProSeal LMA™ laryngeal mask airway compared with a tracheal tube. One hundred consecutive female patients (ASA I–II, 18–75 years) undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery were divided into two equal-sized groups for airway management with the ProSeal LMA or tracheal tube. Anaesthesia management was identical for both groups and included induction of anaesthesia using propofol/fentanyl, and maintenance with propofol/remifentanil, muscle relaxation with rocuronium, positive pressure ventilation, gastric tube insertion, dexamethasone/tropisetron for anti-emetic prophylaxis, and diclofenac for pain prophylaxis. All types of postoperative pain were treated using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine. Patients and postoperative staff were unaware of the airway device used. Data were collected by a single blinded observer. We found that pain scores were lower for the ProSeal LMA at 2 h and 6 h but not at 24 h. Morphine requirements were lower for the ProSeal LMA by 30.4%, 30.6% and 23.3% at 2, 6 and 24 h, respectively. Nausea was less common with the ProSeal LMA than with the tracheal tube at 2 h and 6 h but not at 24 h. There were no differences in the frequency of vomiting, sore throat, dysphonia or dysphagia. We conclude that postoperative pain is lower for the ProSeal LMA than the tracheal tube in females undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
机译:在一项随机双盲前瞻性研究中,我们检验了以下假设:与气管导管相比,接受ProSeal LMA™喉罩气道的患者术后疼痛更低。将100例接受腹腔镜妇科手术的女性患者(ASA I–II,18–75岁)分为两组,每组两组均进行ProSeal LMA或气管导管气道处理。两组的麻醉管理相同,包括使用异丙酚/芬太尼进行麻醉诱导,使用异丙酚/瑞芬太尼维持麻醉,使用罗库溴铵进行肌肉放松,正压通气,胃管插入,地塞米松/托吡司琼用于止吐预防和双氯芬酸用于疼痛预防。所有类型的术后疼痛均使用静脉内自控镇痛(PCA)吗啡进行治疗。患者和术后工作人员不知道所使用的呼吸道装置。数据由一位盲人观察者收集。我们发现ProSeal LMA在2 h和6 h的疼痛评分较低,但在24 h则没有。在2、6和24小时,ProSeal LMA的吗啡需求量分别降低了30.4%,30.6%和23.3%。在2h和6h时,ProSeal LMA的恶心比气管导管少,但在24h时则不常见。呕吐,咽痛,发声困难或吞咽困难的频率无差异。我们得出的结论是,在接受妇科腹腔镜手术的女性中,ProSeal LMA的术后疼痛比气管插管低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号